Saturday, May 6, 2017

Two Deaths, One Week

I started this last week with the sad news of the passing of my dear friend's step-father the day before - which was her wedding day. Her beautiful, emotional, and touching wedding that he was supposed to attend, but didn't. I ended the week yesterday afternoon finding out about a dear family friend's tragic murder in Sequim, Washington (along with her dog) 3 days ago by a young man she knew well. He was recently diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, hospitalized on Tuesday because of an incident where he attacked his mother with a pencil. He had been released the next day from where he went directly to Cynthia's house.

I am stunned to know someone who was not just murdered, but viciously so. I am beyond heartbroken that two families I know have lost a loved one unexpectedly. I am heartbroken that a friend has to start her marriage under such a dark cloud, and that another family has to grieve a loved one lost at the hands of another.

One thing that has made me take a step back is reading comments about the young man who murdered Cynthia. He is sick. He needs help. He needs medication. What he did is wrong. But he is SICK. People are attacking him and calling him names. They probably don't know about his diagnosis but it underscores how quick we are to judge. How quick we are to misunderstand.

Death is so final. I know this brings out a "Duh". But until someone in your inner circle dies, you can't understand the depth of that word "final." I didn't even understand completely despite the painful death of a close neighbor in 1996 from bone cancer and another very close family friend passing in 1999. To me, death was something that happened to others. Of course I knew I'd die one day, but it was in the abstract. When my mom died, mortality punched me in the face. Now, I know. And the depth of the word "final" keeps deepening because, at least, initially, in the first year or two (maybe three, I don't know) there are constant reminders: the empty car you have to sell, the clothes that need to be packed and given away, the books and furniture that need to be given away, bank accounts that need to close... I see all this and think, This will be my stuff one day. My kids will have to do this one day. My kids will feel this one day.

I want to say something inspirational but it all feels cliched. Life is hard. It is unfair. It gives relentlessly and take away mercilessly. We can feel or we can push away. I have mentally aged a lot since my mom's passing last year, and with each subsequent death, I understand more deeply that all we truly have is but this moment right now. Then, it's gone. And we have a new moment. Then, that's gone. And so the clock ticks.

We're so fond of compartmentalizing our lives, prioritizing what is most important to us. For many, it is money at the top of that "most important" list which then dictates every decision in order to reach that goal. I remember the day my mom died, I desperately kept counting the few dollars I found in her purse convincing myself that if I kept counting her money, she'd come back. Money is tangible. You need it. If I just held her money in my hand, she'd be coming back, right? But the fact is, no matter the way of death, you take nothing with you. No body, no car, no money. In the next place, these things aren't needed. Or maybe there's something better.


I can't make these families' pain go away as much I would like to do so. I told my husband last night when I broke the news to him about Cynthia that grieving is such a horrible feeling that I wish I could protect everyone I know from that dark, lonely pain. But I can't. So all I can hope to do is hold my wish deep in my heart for these families to find truth and honesty within themselves to help them cope with this journey. I also hope deeply that we, as a society, get serious about mental health. No one deserves the kind of death Cynthia got. She loved life. She loved to travel. She loved people. A big part of her reminded me of my mom. I hope she is flying free, laughing, smiling, forgiving.

Friday, January 27, 2017

sore loser.

so you call me a
   "sore loser."
guess what?     you're right.

i'm sore women make less than men, and it's 2017.
i'm sore you and trump don't care.

i'm sore that men think it's ok to grab pussy
     and a woman has to accept this as
     "something boys just do."
i'm sore you and trump don't care.

i'm sore that when a woman is raped
     or physically abused
          she is to blame.
i'm sore you and trump don't care.

i'm sore that white people now feel emboldened
     to turn black people away
     from places of business.
i'm sore that you and trump don't care.

i'm sore that anti-semitism is on the rise.
i'm sore that you and trump don't care.

i'm sore that the government wants
     environmental destruction.
i'm sore that you and trump don't care.

i'm sore that LBGQT rights are threatened.
i'm sore that you and trump don't care.

i'm sore that children
     with special needs
        will be
           forgotten.
i'm sore that you and trump don't care.

i'm sore that the religious freedom upon which
     our country was founded is threatened.
i'm sore that you and trump don't care.

i'm sore that you want to make
   ignorance  - the new norm.
i'm sore you and trump don't care.

i'm sore that all the precious rights
   that were so hard-won,
      those same rights that took years to gain
         - and nowhere near where they should be -
are now thrown off the table.
i'm sore that you and trump don't care.

i'm sore that my country and people are losing.
i'm sore that you and trump don't care.

so go ahead, keep calling me a
   "sore loser"
      because
for once,
you'll be in the right.

01.27.17/vb.

Thursday, December 1, 2016

     Trump Saves 1,000 Jobs; A Good Thing, Right?

     Trump will save more than 1,000 jobs in Indiana (out of 197,000 employees with United Technologies, parent company to Carrier Corps, maker of heating and cooling equipment. Also, coincidentally, a company that Vice-President-Elect Pence was originally unable to successfully talk into keeping jobs in his home state).

     Saving these 1,000 jobs is good news, right? Yes, I agree. To a point.

     Trump and Pence won't reveal the details of how this deal came about, but there is speculation that the company was probaby offered a "potential for lower taxes, a potential change in trade policies, etc" and US government contracts. "The Carrier deal could prompt other companies to try the same tactic, predicted Dan Ikenson, director of the Center for Trade Policy Studies at the libertarian Cato Institute. 'It creates a short-term political victory for the president-elect, but it opens up a Pandora's box in the sense that other companies are going to want the same sort of handout,' he said. 'It's better to have an overall policy that companies can bank on.'" [1]

     The way I understand the world, the reason there are policies, laws, and rules is so that everyone in society has an idea of the structure of how things operate. If you don't have a system in place, then how can you try to successfully predict an outcome? If you can't predict an outcome, how can you foresee any challenges? If you can't foresee a challenge, how can you determine that you're making the right decision about something? Without a set system, what will happen when one group is told one thing and another group is told another? How would ethical dilemmas be determined if there is no guideline?

     "Trump's staff also highlighted the president-elect's personal involvement, saying it was a sign of things to come as he works to keep jobs from fleeing. The style is unlikely to work on a larger scale, given the volume of companies that could opt to move manufacturing jobs. It may even provide an incentive for other companies to lodge similar threats in hopes of winning government give-backs." [2]

     I understand it's important for business to have incentive to keep jobs in the US. I wish a company would do that on its own, but it doesn't in the name of profits. And, I'm not necessarily against incentives for businesses. Without a company, there are no jobs. It's not a bad thing to help a company make money because an invenstment in the company is an investment in the employees it hires, and the employees invest in our economy. However, again, with no clear policy set in place in *how* these incentives will work and *what* those incentives will be across the board, I feel this creates an environment where businesses will have the upper hand in squeezing government to get what it wants. And what a business ultimately wants is profit. How do you profit? The easiest way is to start by having cheap labor. Thus, for Trump to meet all his promises, something is going to have to give, and the quickest way to do that is to threaten labor laws, workplace safety, and any other safety measures unions have in store to make sure employees are taken care of. In other words, relax all the laws and regulations that make companies ship jobs overseas where none of those demands have to be met. We all want our Apple and Mac products, our shoes and clothes, and toys for Christmas, but we don't want the high price tag. So, we may see more jobs come back or stay in the US, but the worker - the same person who most likely voted for Trump - will also, most likely, have to give up a lot in order to have that job. Does this help? Yes, there's a job; money in the bank, food on the table. But at what cost?

     This deal with Carrier also highlights the different styles between Obama and Trump. Obama would gather business leaders and academics to discuss economic issues, whereas Trump is "much more comfortable calling up a CEO and admoninishing him than he is sitting around a table with a bunch of policy wonks talking about the best way to change the incentive structure," said Jared Bernstein, a senior fellow at the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities and former economic advisor to Vice-President Joe Biden. He continued, "But if you're going to solve the economics of this, you've got to get at the incentive structure. You can't simply be handing out goodies to every single company that's planning to relocate." [3]

     I have a feeling that we're going to see a lot of action from Trump's Administration which is going to dazzle his supporters. They will get to point a finger at him and say, "Look! Finally someone is *doing* SOMEthing!" And, at the surface, this looks good. In fact, it looks really good. Things in Washington usually move at a glacial pace so this is going to seem like a welcome change. But, there's very little thought being given to what happens beyond that. What happens when a decision is made in haste? What happens when a decision is made without those discussions taking place? What happens when there's no process in place and the driving force is to just check-off a list?

     Again, with no clear structure of the process and incentives, you open up that Pandora's box that will further the divide between the wealthy and the not-so wealthy. And I ask, Who do you think wins at that game?

[1] Bierman, Noah and Puzzanghera, Jim (2016, December 1). Trump saves jobs, but at what cost? Los Angeles Times, p. A8.
[2] Bierman, Noah and Puzzanghera, Jim (2016, December 1). Trump saves jobs, but at what cost? Los Angeles Times, p. A8.
[3] Bierman, Noah and Puzzanghera, Jim (2016, December 1). Trump saves jobs, but at what cost? Los Angeles Times, p. A8.

Sunday, November 13, 2016

it’s not anti-republican, it’s anti-trump

the only other person who could’ve probably incited so much protesting against the election was ted cruz. had john kasich, jeb bush, or marc rubio won, we wouldn’t be where we are now. i’m tired of seeing “get over it” and “chill out” and “stop your whining” from all the trump supporters. a vote for trump was a vote of ignorance for what was at stake.

i am tolerant of intellectual republicans. i was once a republican myself and know that there can be mutual respect and that there can be a productive exchange of ideas. i despised bush, jr for many reasons, but i never felt like i lost my country - even with the illegal war he started. to trump supporters, this was a pissing match. to me, and most others, this was about respect for life (and the environment), our freedom to be who we are, to love whom we want, to accept our differences regardless of religious beliefs, and a chance for us to win fights against hatred, women’s rights and minority rights. this wasn’t a republican vs democrat election. that would’ve been kasich/bush/rubio vs clinton/sanders.

kasich, rubio, and bush would’ve never said, “i could shoot someone and get away with it” and ignite crowds with excitement.

kasich, rubio, and bush would’ve never said, “i can grab any pussy and get away with it” and ignite crowds with excitement.

kasich, rubio, and bush would’ve never said, “‘knock out (anyone who protests us)’” and ignite crowds with excitement.

a republican is not someone who values violence towards others or values racism, but someone who does value violence towards others or who is racist is most likely a republican. 

a republican is not someone who is uneducated but someone who is uneducated is most likely a republican. 

a republican is not someone who is without an understanding of the world at large and our relationship to it, but someone who doesn’t understand the world at large and our relationship to it is most likely a republican.

republican politicians, while i may not agree with most of them, have education and experience to back up their views. they know the chess game. trump had no experience in the political arena, boasted about not knowing how government or foreign policy worked, but still made him captain of a ship he never once even sailed on. i wonder, would trump supporters go to a mechanic for a root canal?

we will be getting a team who will be guided by white, heterosexual, evangelical views. 

this is happening in a land founded by illegal immigrants who were intellectuals with views that government stay out of people’s business and who prided themselves on the notion of separation of church and state.


digest that irony.

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

so much hate, so much darkness, so much spite; my heart hurts

in regards to last night's presidential election, i'm scared for my rights as a woman and the future for my children, i'm scared for all my minority friends and their families, i'm scared for all muslims, i'm scared for our environment and Mother Earth, i'm heartbroken that someone who mistreats everyone he comes across, someone who doesn't respect his workers and doesn't pay his workers, someone who believes women are objects to be grabbed and jerked around, someone who doesn't understand how government works and whose followers believe he's going to just "fire" congress, someone who will represent me but spews so much hatred and violence - values i don't have and values i don't teach my children, someone who will flies off the handle on whim, someone with no respect for our country and all the gains, someone who doesn't *care* to understand the ins and outs of our government, or OUR WORLD, or our economy and its tangled web, someone who not once ever cared about anyone else other than himself so as to stroke his bankrupt-ass ego, i'm heartbroken that someone like that will get to call himself President.

this is just the beginning...

From Feminists United on Facebook:


and this from a woman named Ingrid Jackson on Facebook:


i don't want hate and darkness to win. i can't believe it has with lasting consequences for my and my friends' children.

and speaking of children, if you have them, this is an excellent article to read what to tell them about the results of last night's election.

and i leave you with the incredibly insightful blog post from John Pavlovitz about why those of us who wanted Hillary Clinton to win. among other things, it was a race "about our views of people's worth." please read it.


Friday, November 4, 2016

Supermarkets and Birth Control

     A birth control law passed in my native state of California was supposed to be ground-breaking and, while it was, it's been slow to come to fruition. Quelle surprise, right? Women should have easier access to fill their BC prescriptions by taking them to a pharmacy, but this has proven to be a lot more challenging than it should be.

     On this blog post, I'll be referring to this Los Angeles Times article that presents the delays that women still face in accessing BC despite the new law. The law doesn't require pharmacies to provide BC through the new law, and many aren't sure that they ever will, but it would make things a lot easier for women, that's for sure. The reluctance of some pharmacies is "in part because it could take up to an hour to complete the process for dispensing contraception to women. They must take the patient's blood pressure, administer a questionnaire about health issues that could raise red flags and go over side effects." (1)

          1) Taking time to check-in on a woman's health is somehow more burdensome than
              unwanted pregnancies?
          2) And while they should, I have never had a pharmacist go over side effects with me. They
              tell me to hit "yes" on the prompt that they went over the side effects with me and then I
              sign my name attesting that this actually happened. Yes, we're both liars.

     Nihar Mandavia, pharmacist and owner of Drugist Pharmacy in Laguna Niguel, has the right idea. He "doesn't think the extra time spent with patients will be a burden for his staff...[helping] customers with such services [like consultation] can give independent pharmacies like his an edge over big chains." (2) Go Mandavia. If I could afford Laguna Niguel and used BC, I would be your customer. If I owned a pharmacy, I'd be your competitor.

     The real problem, though, could be the actual consultation. BC is covered by the Affordable Care Act, but not the consultation itself, and it's unclear whether private insurance companies would, or will, cover it. The price of the consultation seems to be somewhere in the $40-$50 range and could prevent those who don't have the money to go to the doctor's to seek out BC. (Although to THAT I would say, Go to Planned Parenthood.) Despite this, though, it's good to know that starting in January, the state's health insurance, Medi-Cal, will begin covering any consultation fees. Hooray! And the other good news is that under another law passed this year in CA, women will be able to get a year's supply of BC at once instead of having to go each month (or in the case of Planned Parenthood, every 3 months). Double hooray!

     Currently, these supermarkets' pharmacies will fill your BC:

                    - Albertsons
                    - Vons
                    - Vons Pavilions
                    - Safeway

     A statewide pilot program is under way with

                    - CVS (5 in LA; locations weren't listed)

     Still ironing out details:

                    - Walgreens
                    - Ralphs

     Hopefully we can get more insurance coverage and women don't have to hide or go on a senseless, time-consuming hunt just for wanting to take control of their health and life.

1. Karlamangla, Soumya (2016, October 31). Women still face delays Los Angeles Times, B5.
2. Karlamangla, Soumya (2016, October 31). Women still face delays Los Angeles Times, B5.